Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miss Dianna's School of Dance, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 2016No. SC95102Published

1DissentGeorge W. Draper Iii, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the principal opinion in that I would find Miss Dianna’s School of Dance, Inc. (hereinafter, “School of Dance”) is not a place of recreation under the sales tax law, section 144.020.1(2), RSMo 2000.1 Accordingly, I would reverse the Administrative Hearing Commission’s decision.

“Statutes relating to taxation are strictly construed against the taxing authority and in favor of the taxpayer.” Spudich v. Dir. of Revenue, 745 S.W.2d 677, 680 (Mo. banc 1988). This Court uses a de minimis litmus test in' determining whether the amusement or recreational activities at a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Columbia Athletic Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Spudich v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Bolivar Road News, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Wilson's Total Fitness Center, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. Michael Jaudes Fitness Edge, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API