Legal Opinion

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 3, 2016No. SC95181PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• Zel M; Fischer, Judge

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation petitions for review of'the Administrative Hearing Commission’s decision ruling that Krispy Kreme is not entitled to a refund of sales tax paid on food items sold from its stores between April 2003 and December 2005. The Commission ruled Krispy Kreme failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that not more than 80% of its food products were sold for immediate consumption op or off the. .premises of the establishment; therefore, the. lower tax rate authorized by § 144.014 1 did not apply to Krispy Kreme’s food sales. Krispy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. Richard E. Ivie, Jimmie R. Ivie, LaDonna Small, and Bernard Ivie v. Arnold L. Smith and Sidney B. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  4. Parktown Imports, Inc. v. Audi of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Rice v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barr v. Mo. State Dep't of Soc. Servs.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. St. Louis Rams LLC v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Gate Gourmet, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. ANDREW HALSEY and TAMMY KENNEDY v. TOWNSEND TREE SERVICE COMPANY, LLC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. GREGORY PHELPS v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER AS CUSTODIAN OF THE SECOND INJURY FUNDMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API