Legal Opinion
Deike v. Smelting
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 13, 1987No. CX-87-966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Relator Daniel Deike seeks review of a determination that he is disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits because he engaged in misconduct when he disregarded his supervisor’s orders and walked off the job. We affirm.
FACTS
Daniel Deike was employed as a maintenance worker for the Gopher Smelting and Refining Company (“Gopher”) from February 15, 1985 through December 3, 1986. He worked the 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. shift.
On June 18, 1986, Deike received a verbal warning for tardiness, and on July 24 he received a written warning for tardiness.
Deike was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Sandstrom v. Douglas MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Daniels v. Gnan TruckingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Deering v. Unitog Rental ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ruzynski v. Cub Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Application of AllersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995