Sandstrom v. Douglas MacHine Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This is an appeal from a determination by the Commissioner of Economic Security that relator was discharged from his employment and was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
Relator Gerald Sandstrom began working as a technical writer for the respondent on April 2, 1984. On June 19, 1984 the respondent initiated a policy requiring all employees who had access to confidential information to sign an employee classified information agreement. That agreement required the employees to promise, inter alia,
not to remove or divulge to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Green v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Simpson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Independent School District No. 709 v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Woodward v. Interstate Office SystemsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Reed v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Golden Valley, District 5Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.