State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Writ of prohibition issued from the supreme court upon relation of Barber Asphalt Paving Company, directed to the judges of the district court for St. Louis county and to the city of Duluth, and requiring them to show cause why an absolute writ should not issue restraining them from further proceeding in a matter pending in said district court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Application for a writ of prohibition to the judges of the district court of the county of St. Louis, directing them to refrain from hearing a certain cause or proceeding alleged to be pending before that court.
The facts are as follows: The relator, Barber Asphalt Paving Company, is a corporation created, organized, and existing under the laws of the state of Virginia, but doing business in the state of Minnesota. On August ii, 1902, in proceedings had by the city council of Duluth, a contract was duly awarded to relator for paving a portion of Superior street in that city, and thereafter a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Happy v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- State ex rel. Blaisdell v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Robinson v. Bd. of Supervisors of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Mason v. MessengerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Grant v. BerrisfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Schigley v. City of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.