Rue v. Merrill
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
This action was brought by Rue and another against Merrill, Shupak and Brown. The interveners intervened, asking that their title to nine-tenths of certain royalties in dispute be quieted in them. The defendant Merrill was not served and did not appear in the case. The defendants Shupak and Brown filed a cross-petition asking that the title to the royalty in dispute be quieted in the defendant Brown. The interveners do not dispute among themselves, and for the sake of brevity will be hereinafter referred to as such, intermediate conveyances among them will be disregarded, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Betts v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Dobbins v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Snively v. MathesonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Vanhoose v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Murphy v. SteelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dame v. MileskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Oregon Basin Oil and Gas Company v. Ohio Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Thomas v. RothWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Oregon Basin Oil and Gas Company v. Ohio Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952