Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Steel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 13, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Wood, J.

This is an action by the appellant's against the appellee to cancel a certain deed which the appellants alleged was executed to the appellee through .mistake. The appellants alleged in suhstancd that they intended to execute to appellee a deed conveying to him a one-fourth royalty interest in the SE^ of the NW14 of section 28, township 15 south, range 15 west, Ouachita County, Arkansas, in which ithe appellants had executed an oil and gas lease to one T. J. Murphy; that by mutual mistake, instead of describing the lands as above, the scrivener described it ás. follows: The NE% of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawley v. DillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Frazer v. State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Deskins v. Big Sandy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  4. Fleischer v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Buck v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oil Fields Corporation v. DashkoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Standard Accident Insurance Company v. WilmansDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
  3. Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1974
  4. Rue v. MerrillWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  5. James v. Centex Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API