Snively v. Matheson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
This action was brought by the appellant against David Matheson and Charles Dickson, co-partners under the firm name and style of Matheson & Dickson, to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a certain grading outfit comprised of mules, scrapers, etc., and given to secure a certain promissory note signed by Matheson and Dickson in the partnership name. G. E. Dickson, who had obtained judgment against the firm of Matheson & Dickson for something over $600, and who had attached the property embraced in the *89chattel mortgage given to appellant, was also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deardorf's Administrator v. ThacherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Smith v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Judge v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Harris v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Emerick v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vancouver National Bank v. KatzWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Schumacher v. the Sumner Tele. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Swanson v. Webb Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Rue v. MerrillWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Gordon v. MarburgerWashington Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.