Rubinsky v. Kosh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
This is an appeal from a judgment in ejectment, entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff’s alleged ownership is derived through a sheriff’s sale of the property in dispute, on an execution issued on a judgment against one Y. M. Skrotsky. Immediately preceding the bidding at that sale, a notice was read warning intending purchasers that Skrotsky’s record title was obtained by fraud, the character of which was detailed in the notice; that the present defendants were still the real owners of the property; and that no title would pass by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Schwartz v. WhelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Rubinsky v. Kosh, GuardianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Glessner v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Schnurman v. HillegasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paley v. TrautmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Vetter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Walter J. Scanlan & Son v. SherbineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Haun v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Patterson v. WarwickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.