Legal Opinion

Rubinsky v. Kosh, Guardian

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1929No. Appeal, 77PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In this action of ejectment, plaintiff filed a statement of claim and abstract of title; defendants, a plea, answer and counter-abstract; the former entered a rule to show cause why, on the pleadings,-he should' not have judgment in his favor, and the court below made this rule absolute. At the same term,’ however, it struck off that judgment, on motion of defendants, because not “based on the opinion or action of the court on the pleadings, but on an alleged default of the defendants in failing to file an answer to the rule [to show cause] which called for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moore v. Luzerne CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Smith v. MarklandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Mitchell v. KintzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Culbertson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Chrzanowski v. ChrzanowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. New York & Penna. Co. v. N. Y. Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Allegany Gas Co. v. KempSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Daub's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API