Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Whelan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1929No. Appeals, 119 and 126PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

By an agreement which recited that the defendants, J. R. and J. A. Whelan, were the “owners in fee” of a lot of ground, plaintiffs agreed with them to erect thereon a four-story apartment building for the sum of $12,575. Part of the work specified was to be “plastering......in basement where noted.” Plaintiffs did the wTork, except the plastering in the basement, and received $7,750 in cash and notes for $2,500. Neither the notes, nor the balance of the contract price, was paid, whereupon plaintiffs filed a mechanic’s lien against the property, alleging that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Car & Foundry Co. v. Alexandria Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Nice v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Keck v. VandykeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. O'Connell v. CeaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Gonzalez v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Wyatt Inc. v. CITIZENS BANK OF PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Kittaning Coal Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Hoffman Lumber Co. v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API