Legal Opinion

Haun v. McCabe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1932No. Appeal, 86PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This is an appeal from the action of the court below in refusing a new trial, and entering judgment on a verdict for plaintiff, Mary Haun. The suit is in trespass for damages for the death of her husband, Charles Haun, alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of an automobile by defendant, J. P. McCabe. There are six assignments of error; however, they present but three questions for our consideration.

On March 30,1930, about 8: 30 in the evening, the said Charles Haun, his wife and their two children, were walking four abreast along the highway from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KoshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Felski v. ZeidmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. McGettigan v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Jackson v. LitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Curry v. WillsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Boyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Valles v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Paley v. TrautmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API