Legal Opinion

Walter J. Scanlan & Son v. Sherbine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1955No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

Defendant, Sherbine, appeals from judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in an action of trespass brought by plaintiff, Walter J. Scanlan & Son, to recover for coal mined and roads destroyed by Sherbine on lands under lease to plaintiff. The defense was invalidity of plaintiff’s lease by reason of fraud practiced by plaintiff upon the lessors in the procurement of the lease, and that Sherbine had a valid lease of the premises.

On April 16, 1948, Walter Scanlan, one of the members of plaintiff-partnership, leased from one Basal and others, for a term of three years,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. FerrebeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Glessner v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Rubinsky v. KoshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Ridgway National Bank, Guardian of the Estate of Robert Aiello, a Mental Incompetent v. North American Van Lines, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Black v. A. E. Troutman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API