Fuhrman v. California Satellite Systems
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
*416Opinion
CARR, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Marian Fuhrman appeals from a judgment dismissing her first amended complaint after the court sustained defendants’ demurrers without leave to amend. The primary issue presented on appeal is whether two settlement demand letters sent by defendants to plaintiff and several thousand other residents of Sacramento County are absolutely privileged as publications made in connection with a judicial proceeding. (Civ. Code, § 47, subd. 2.)
We conclude that under the present posture of the case the trial court erred in finding as a fact that the letters are absolutely…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- 1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.