Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1987No. 86-1105PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
Resolution of the instant appeal requires analysis of the uninsured motorist and automatic pay provisions contained within the contract of insurance issued by Preferred Risk. The uninsured motorist coverage prescribed therein provides as follows:
*341“PART IV
“PROTECTION AGAINST UNINSURED MOTORISTS
“COVERAGE U-Bodily Injury Benefit:
“To pay all sums which the insured * * * shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured motor vehicle because of bodily injury, * * * sustained by the insured * * *.
“ ‘Insured’ means:
“(a) the named insured and any relative; * * *
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Hedrick v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Shear v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bobko v. SagenOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Great American Insurance v. Hartford InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- J&H Reinforcing & Structural Erectors, Inc. v. Ohio School Facilities Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Miller v. RomanauskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.