Great American Insurance v. Hartford Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph E. Mahoney, Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Professional Electric Products, Inc. (“Pepeo”), and John Borkey, Jr. (“Borkey”), appeal from the judgment of the trial court that third-party defendant-appellee, Hartford Insurance Company (“Hartford”), was not obligated under its insurance policy to defend appellants in a suit brought by one of appellants’ former employees wherein the employee alleged causes of action based on intentional torts.
Appellants’ former employee, Dennis Japel, filed a complaint against Pepeo and later filed an amended complaint against Borkey, president of Pepeo. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- SOLO CUP COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Physicians Insurance v. SwansonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Wedge Products, Inc. v. Hartford Equity Sales Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hs Services, Inc., a California Corporation v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Travelers Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Peterborough Oil Co. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Low v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Helman v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.