Bagford v. Ephraim City
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs John M. Bagford and Fae H. Bagford, proprietors of a garbage collection business, appeal a district court judgment holding that an Ephraim City garbage collection ordinance does not result in a taking of the Bagfords’ private garbage collection business. The ordinance provides for municipal garbage collection and requires all city residents to pay a fee for the city’s garbage collection, whether or not the residents are using the city’s facilities. The Bagfords assert that the district court erred in ruling that their loss of business from…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Crippen v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Utah Department of Transportation v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Salt Lake County v. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.