Legal Opinion

Long Island Water Supply Co. v. Brooklyn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1897No. 216PublishedCited by 171 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Under authority of chap. 737 of the laws of New York for 1873, (Laws N. Y. 1873, p. 1100), as amended in 1881 (Laws N. Y. 1881, chap. 321, p. 443), the plaintiff in error was organized as a water company. On September 15, 1881, it entered into a contract with the town of New Lots, by which it agreed to lay water pipes and mains in the streets of New Lots, and supply the town with water.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Under authority of chap. 737 of the laws of New York for 1873, (Laws N. Y. 1873, p. 1100), as amended in 1881 (Laws N. Y. 1881, chap. 321, p. 443), the plaintiff in error was organized as a water company. On September 15, 1881, it entered into a contract with the town of New Lots, by which it agreed to lay water pipes and mains in the streets of New Lots, and supply the town with water. The town, on the other hand, agreed to pay for hydrants to be furnished and supplied, as provided in the contract, at a specified rate per hydrant, the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewee

So far as respects any mere matter of procedure,, or of conflict between the statute authorizing the condemnation or the proceedings had thereunder and the constitution of the State, the decision of the Court of Appeals is conclusive. West River Bridge Company v. Dix, 6 How. 507; Bucher v. Cheshire Railroad, 125 U. S. 555; Adams Express Company v. Ohio, 165 U. S. 194. Our inquiry must be directed to the question whether any rights of the water supply company secured by the Constitution of the United States have been, violated. The contention of plaintiff in error is that the proceedings had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  5. Bucher v. Cheshire RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API