Legal Opinion

Crippen v. City of Cedar Rapids

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 2000No. 98-1801PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The appellants/plaintiffs, Donald Crip-pen, Joan Crippen, and Barbara Maitland, operate a private recycling business under the name of HMR Home and Business Recyclers. (We will refer to the appellants collectively as “HMR”) The appel-lees/defendants, the City of Cedar Rapids and the City of Marion, implemented residential curbside recycling as a city service through their respective solid waste management departments. Appellee/defen-dant, Bluestem Solid Waste Agency, is a joint agency of the City of Cedar Rapids and Linn County; it participated in the promotion of the cities’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fogel v. Trustees of Iowa CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. State v. KlawonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Bormann v. KOSSUTH COUNTY BD. OF SUP'RSSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Cathryn Ann Linn v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Phillips v. Covenant ClinicSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Lloyd v. Drake UniversitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. McIlravy v. North River Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Parish v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API