Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Pixler

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1958No. 6542PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an action filed by plaintiffs based upon a written contract whereby plaintiffs agreed to drill a well on the land of the defendant. Plaintiffs alleged full performance of the contract, an indebtedness of $2,500 due, and reasonable attorney’s fees in accordance with the terms of the contract. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of $2,500 as damages for the breach of contract and $800 as attorney’s fees, and from such judgment and order denying a new trial defendant appeals.

The written contract entered into between the parties was admitted in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Eldredge v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mason v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Collins v. Riverside Amusement Park Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Matson v. BradburyArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Sharp v. Hui Wahine, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Elson Development Co. v. Arizona Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Wallace v. Casper Adjustment ServiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API