Legal Opinion

Shetter v. Rochelle

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 25, 1966No. 2 CA-CIV 95PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

Appellee’s motion for rehearing has raised a matter not presented in the briefs concerning whether this action should be sent back for a new trial or reversed with instructions to enter judgment for the defendant.

The appellee has cited and quoted to this court general statements in the law which might seem to support the contention made that proper appellate procedure at this posture of the case would be to send this case back for a new trial. Among the statements so quoted is:

“And generally it may be said that when it appears that the plaintiff can probably make a better…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crouch v. PixlerArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Crouch v. TrumanArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fritts v. EricsonArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Arnett v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Jones v. Howard University, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API