Legal Opinion
State v. Obeta
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 2011No. A10-1349PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Respondent Nathan Obeta was found guilty by a jury and convicted of first- and third-degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.342, subd. l(e)(i), and 609.344, subd. 1(c) (2010). On appeal, the court of appeals reversed Obeta’s convictions based on the cumulative effect of several trial errors. State v. Obeta (Obeta I), No. A08-1419, 2009 WL 2596102 (Minn.App. Aug. 25, 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Nov. 17, 2009). On remand, appellant State of Minnesota requested a pretrial order from the district court allowing it to present expert-opinion evidence to rebut…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Olivo, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew MosleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Gerace v. BentleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- State v. WentheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.