Legal Opinion
Rice v. Vermilyn Brown, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 2, 1995No. 15123PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The dispositive issue raised by this appeal is whether General Statutes (Cum. Sup. 1939) § 133061 bars the workers’ compensation claim of the decedent, Carl Rice (claimant), against the named defendant, Ver*782milyn Brown, Inc. (Vermilyn Brown).2 The compensation commissioner (commissioner) concluded that the claimant was entitled to certain benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act)3 for an occupational disease caused by his exposure to asbestos in 1942 during the course of his employment with Vermilyn Brown. On appeal, the compensation review board (review board) reversed the finding…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Coley v. Camden Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Andersen Consulting, LLP v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.