Legal Opinion
Grenall v. Grenall
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1959No. Civ. 23479PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Plaintiff appeals from two orders entered on March 28, 1958: (1) an order denying her motion to vacate a former order which provided for the termination of her alimony payments at the expiration of one year; and (2) an order denying her application for increased alimony payments and for an extension thereof beyond the expiration date set by the former order. The ground of attack on the first order is that it was void because it was not based upon any properly noticed motion. The second order is challenged as constituting a manifest abuse of judicial discretion.
In 1948 plaintiff was granted a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. LionbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Banks v. BanksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Hester v. HesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Jordan v. JordanIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Agnew v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Marxer v. MarxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.