Legal Opinion

Hester v. Hester

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1969No. Civ. 9379PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHELAN, J.

Henry Hester, defendant, appeals from an order of March 18, 1968, which continued in effect a permanent alimony provision of $700 per month in the interlocutory decree of divorce.

The interlocutory judgment of divorce of January 6, 1967, based upon an oral stipulation of the parties, provided in part: “It Is Further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that defendant shall pay to plaintiff as and for her support and maintenance the sum of $700.00 per month commencing on the 14th day of December 14 [szc], 1966, and continuing at equal monthly periods to and including July 14, 1967.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bratnober v. BratnoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Molema v. MolemaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ralphs v. RalphsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Engelberg v. EngelbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. In Re Marriage of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. In Re Marriage of MulhernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Dorr v. NewmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API