Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2012No. COA11-941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the admission of testimony from a witness defendant proffered for qualification as an expert, we hold no error. Where the restraint of the victim did not extend beyond that inherent in the commission of the sexual assaults and the assault by strangulation, the trial court erred in entering judgment against defendant on the charge of first-degree kidnapping. And, where defendant was not entitled to an instruction on assault on a female as a lesser included offense, we hold no error.

On 3 November 2008, a Carteret County…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API