State v. King

STROUD, Judge.

*441 Defendant appeals judgment convicting him of second degree sexual offense and second degree kidnapping. For the following reasons, we conclude there was no error.

I. Background

The State's evidence tended to show that in August of 2005, Marie 1 contacted defendant to look at a rental property. Defendant arranged to meet Marie and drove her to the rental house. After they went inside for Marie to look at the house, defendant grabbed Marie by the throat and began kissing her neck and breasts. Defendant moved Marie from the hallway to a bedroom with his hands on her throat and threw…