Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 2016No. 15-468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

*727 This case arises from a motion for appropriate relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in the second of two criminal trials, the first trial having resulted in a hung jury on all but one charge. We hold that because the motion raised disputed issues of fact, the trial court was required to conduct an evidentiary hearing before denying relief, and we therefore reverse the order below and remand the matter.

*728 Defendant Todd Joseph Martin ("Defendant") appeals the order which denied his motion for appropriate relief ("MAR"), without holding an evidentiary hearing, on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. HardisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. CholonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. State v. CholonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API