Everett v. Buchanan
Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota
Appeal from the District Court of Minnehaha County. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court. No briefs filed.
1Opinion of the CourtKidder, J.
Numerous assignments of error were made by the appellant, but upon the argument all were abandoned save these three:
1. The Court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrer.
2. The Court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a continuance.
*2513. The Court erred in refusing to enter judgment in accordance with the special verdict.
We shall proceed to examine these alleged errors in the order in which they are assigned.
The allegations of the complaint, to which the demurrer was directed, are as follows:
1. “ That at the time hereinafter mentioned the plaintiff was lawfully possessed 0f * * * * * then…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Wilson v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Patchin v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1834
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Weaver v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Metheny v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.