Legal Opinion

Edmisson v. Drumm-Flato Commission Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error from the District Court of Woods County; before John L. McAtee, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

BueRORD, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error, E. C. Edmisson, who was plaintiff in the court below, brought an action in the district court of Woods county against the Drumm Flato Commission Company, a corporation, and J. E. Gober, defendants, to recover several thousand dollars for an alleged conversion of several hundred head of cattle. The plaintiff in his petition alleged that on the 22nd day of November, 1899, he was indebted to the Drumm Flato Commission Company in a large sum of money, which was evidenced by several promissory notes, and all secured by chattel mortgage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Wolf v. WasherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Bequillard v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Christie v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Rogers v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Sartain v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Later v. HaywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API