Legal Opinion

Zigrang v. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2005No. 04-455PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Appellant U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc. (Piper), appeals from the decision of the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, denying its motion to compel arbitration of claims asserted by Respondent Nancy Zigrang (Zigrang). We remand for further proceedings.

¶2 We address whether the District Court properly ruled that the arbitration clause contained in the SEP-IRA agreement signed by Zigrang is enforceable as to the claims against Piper and, therefore, whether Zigrang must arbitrate her dispute.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 This case represents one of twenty-three lawsuits…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGLMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Polzin v. Appleway Equipment Leasing, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Peeler v. Rocky Mountain Log Homes Can., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Day v. CTA, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API