Legal Opinion
Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGL
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 2009No. DA 06-0566PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Santana Kortum-Managhan appeals an order of the District Court *476for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, granting a motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration filed by Herbergers NBGL, Herbergers HB, Household/Herbergers, and Saks Incorporated (collectively, Herbergers). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
¶2 Kortum-Managhan raises the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Can a credit issuer require a consumer to take affirmative action to avoid being deemed to have accepted a substantial change in the parties’ original agreement which adds a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Dale Mortensen v. Bresnan CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Woodruff v. Bretz, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Global Client Solutions, LLC v. OsselloMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- Graziano v. STOCK FARM HOMEOWNERS ASS'NMontana Supreme Court · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.