Guardianship of Wells
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
The appellant was the guardian in the matter of the above estate; and on November 15, 1892, filed the first account of his guardianship, which was thereafter duly approved. On December 22, 1897, his ward having attained her majority, he filed his final account, which on January 7, 1898, was likewise settled and approved.
On January 7, 1899, the ward filed a petition in the superior court entitled “In the matter of said estate,” to set aside the orders theretofore made settling said accounts, and to reopen both of the accounts of said guardian, on the ground of fraud, alleging in that behalf,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lataillade v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Rafferty v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In re Estate of ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Adams v. Bank of WoodlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SlinkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- In re Raleigh's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- King v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.