Legal Opinion

Aguiar & Bello v. Brock

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 18, 1938No. 22PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COSGRAVE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, being some 300 owners of dairy cattle in Merced County, seek in this action to enjoin the enforcement of the California Tuberculosis Eradication Act contained in Sections 221 to 254, inclusive, of the State Agricultural Code, St.Cal. 1933, pp. 97-105. Agricultural Code of California, page 50. They complain that under authority of the act in question the defendants, who are the officers of the State charged with the enforcement of the act, have proclaimed the whole county of Merced to be a control area, and threaten to carry out the provisions of the act,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Samuels v. McCurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Coelho v. TruckellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SchriberOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. Hill, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API