Brooks v. A. M. F., Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
These consolidated certiorari appeals by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Prudential Insurance Company, and General American Life Insurance Company, health insurance intervenors, require our review of decisions by the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals denying inter-venors’ requests for reimbursement of medical expenses paid for employees who settled their workers’ compensation claims without intervenors’ agreement prior to trial on the merits. At issue is the adequacy of procedures employed by the Workers’ Compensation Division and the court of appeals, by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lemmer v. Batzli Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. FrechetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BachrachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Repo v. CAPITOL ELEVATOR CO., DIV. OF IMCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tatro v. Hartmann's StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3Cited by11 opinions
- General American Life Insurance v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Gamble v. Twin Cities Concrete ProductsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Thanh Le v. Kurt ManufacturingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Vetsch v. Schwan's Sales EnterprisesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.