Edquist v. Browning-Ferris
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This workers’ compensation appeal raises issues with respect both to the amount of the fee to which employee’s attorney was entitled and the extent of the lien therefor provided by Minn.Stat. §§ 481.13 and 176.-081, subd. 1 (1984).
The facts are not in dispute. Employee received $7,651 in unemployment compensation benefits for several months before his claim for workers’ compensation benefits was heard. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the compensation judge, after determining that employee had been entitled to compensation for temporary total or temporary partial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kahn v. State, University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Johnson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental PlanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mann v. Unity Medical Center/Health CentralSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Ransom v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Barnick v. Swift Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Bradford v. Bureau of EngravingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.