Legal Opinion

McArdle v. Williams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1935No. 310,150PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to a verdict rendered for plaintiffs. Their blended motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial was denied.

James McArdle and son Linus, plaintiffs, did some plowing upon a farm then owned and occupied by the former but which had been foreclosed by defendants (under a second mortgage owned by them) and bid in by them at the foreclosure sale. The plowing was done before the redemption period had expired. It appears that in 1924 James McArdle being,the owner of a half section of land in Waseca county…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benedict v. PfunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Balafas v. BalafasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Capital Warehouse Co. v. McGill-Warner-Farnham Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API