Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Desfosses

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1987No. 87-201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court {Goode, J.), holding sua sponte that the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), waived its right to contest uninsured motorist (UM) coverage because it failed to stay an arbitrator’s award of damages to the defendant, Paul B. Desfosses (Desfosses), in the total amount of UM coverage in dispute. For the reasons that follow, we do not address the issue *261of waiver, but rather, limit ourselves to the inter-policy stacking issue and hold that the ambiguity contained in the exclusionary clause gives rise to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Smith v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Beliveau v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Curtis v. Guaranty Trust Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Limoges v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. Hawn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API