Legal Opinion
Beliveau v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 14, 1980No. 79-016PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
This is a petition for declaratory judgment brought by Roger Beliveau to determine the validity of an exclusion in the uninsured motorist provisions of three automobile liability insurance policies. The Trial Court (Wyman, J.) held that the “household exclusion clause” applied to the facts agreed upon and was not repugnant to the State’s uninsured motorist statute, RSA 268:15-a. We affirm.
Richard Beliveau, the plaintiff’s son and member of his household, owned an Opel Cadet that was not insured. On March 30,1976, while Richard was a passenger in his own vehicle, it collided with an automobile…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Lowery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Allstate Insurance Company v. MeeksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Soule v. Stuyvesant InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Dullenty v. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.