Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Valenzuela

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1945No. Crim. 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

By means of habeas corpus the petitioner seeks to obtain his discharge from state prison on the ground that he has served a sentence in excess of the maximum term of ten years for the principal offense of manslaughter of which he was convicted, and that the trial court neglected to determine specifically that he is an habitual criminal under section 644 of the Penal Code, although he pleaded guilty as charged in an information to three prior felonies included in that section, for each of which, it was alleged, he “served a term of imprisonment therefor” in a designated state prison in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re GilliamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. VaileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. FrancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. WhittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API