People v. Wallace
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Defendant appeals from judgment, after jury verdict, of conviction of violation of section 211, Penal Code (first degree robbery).
Questions Presented
1. Assistance of counsel was effective.
2. No error in instruction and argument on conspiracy.
3. No abuse of discretion in allowing joint trial of defendant and a codefendant.
4. Habitual criminal adjudication proper.
5. Wallace knew implications of his admission of priors.
6. Publicity did not prevent fair trial.
Record
Defendants, George C. Wallace, William Conrad Kucel and Duane Fergus Heaney, were charged with violation of section…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. White & StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. WheatmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. GauldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.