Humphries v. . Edwards
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
After stating the case: The first question is, whether there was any evidence that defendant prosecuted the plaintiff for the assault without probable cause, for in an action of this kind it is necessary to allege and prove malice, a want of probable cause, and the termination of the former suit or proceedings. R. R. v. Hardware Co., 138 N.C. 174.
Malice may be inferred from the absence of probable cause, or may be otherwise established. Johnson v. Chambers, 32 N.C. 287; Kelly v.Traction Co., 132 N.C. 369; Merrell v. Dudley, 139 N.C. 57. And then there is general malice and particular malice,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Jackson v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Wilkinson v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- State v. . RawlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Mooney v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.