Legal Opinion
Hunnihan v. Mattatuck Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 30, 1997No. SC 15751PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this administrative appeal is whether the defendant Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association (association),1 is obligated to pay *440a proportionate contribution toward a workers’ compensation award when a former insurer from whom reimbursement otherwise could be sought is insolvent.2 The association appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision by the workers’ compensation commissioner for the fifth district (commissioner) ordering the association to reimburse a codefendant, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. State Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.