Legal Opinion

Rhee v. Witco Chemical Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 1, 1989No. 86 C 3338PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on two motions: plaintiff’s, Young Rhee, Motion for Entry of a Protective Order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) requiring defendant, Witco Chemical Corp., both to pay plaintiff’s testifying expert a reasonable fee for time spent preparing for and attending his deposition by defendant and to pay 50% of the reasonable fees and expenses incurred by plaintiff in obtaining facts and opinion from plaintiff’s expert, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(C); and defendant’s Motion to Compel plaintiff’s compliance with paragraph 5 of the court’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Worley v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1978
  3. Eliasen v. HamiltonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Keith v. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Herbst v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Magee v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  2. Hose v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  4. Patterson Farm, Inc. v. City of Britton, SDDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1998
  5. Collins v. Village of WoodridgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API