Legal Opinion
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1982No. 81 Civ. 458 (RLC)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
In the latest flurry of bitter, sometimes peevish papers that have been filed in this action, Carter-Wallace, Inc. (“C-W”), and Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc. (“Hartz”), have each brought two motions.
In its first motion, C-W asks the court, pursuant to Rules 26(b)(3) and 37, F.R. Civ.P., to order two of Hartz’ top executives to respond to questions that they refused to answer at C-W’s depositions or, in the alternative, to rule them ineligible to testify at trial. In addition, C-W seeks to compel testimony and the production of materials that Hartz…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Admiral Insurance v. United States District Court for the District of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- P. & B. Marina, L. P. v. LograndeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.