Legal Opinion
Francisco v. Schmidt
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 23, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-C-44PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff Donald Francisco has brought this action upon authority under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The plaintiff seeks damages as well as backpay and reinstatement to his job as a civilian electrician for the Department of the Air Force. Named as defendants are Bernhart Schmidt, a civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force who is Operations and Maintenance Foreman of Base Civil Engineering at General Billy Mitchell Field, Milwaukee, Wisconsin;…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Drayton v. Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- City of Chicago v. Reliable Truck Parts Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Francisco v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- Parsons v. AguirreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Kaiser v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987