Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Miller
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 86-3102PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion For a Writ of Mandamus. Plaintiffs are suing four officers of the United States Capitol Police for alleged actions related to the death of their dog, and now are asking the Court to compel the Clerk of the Court to enter a default against defendant David C. Miller for failing to answer the complaint within 20 days of service. After consideration of plaintiffs’ motion, the opposition thereto, and the entire record, the Court concludes that plaintiffs have failed to effect proper service.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canadian Transport Company, a Division of MacMillan Bloedel (Alberni) Limited Bocimar N v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Lawrence v. AcreeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Ray Dickens v. Phil LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Wise v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986
- Francisco v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pollack v. MeeseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990