Legal Opinion
Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. Etc. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 1954PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
123 Cal.App.2d Supp. 979 (1954)
LOWELL M. CHRISTOFFER, Respondent,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.
California Court of Appeals.
Mar. 1, 1954.
Ray W. Hays and James N. Hays for Appellants.
John Said for Respondent.
KELLAS, J.
The facts are agreed to by all parties. On the 20th day of December, 1951, appellants issued an automobile insurance policy to one Nora Lee Haskins, as the owner of a 1949 Crosley station wagon. Such policy contained the following insuring agreement:
"Coverage C--Medical Payments"
"To pay all reasonable expenses incurred within one year…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Ross v. Protective Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Perkins v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Hendricks v. American Employers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Cocking v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Mondelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.