Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1941No. Civ. 11443PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action to recover from defendant insurance company the amount of a judgment secured by them against a policyholder of defendant company, which judgment had not been paid by the assured. The trial court held that under the terms of the policy the defendant company had already paid on behalf of the assured to the plaintiffs the total amount required by the policy, and that plaintiffs should only recover $15.25 costs incurred in the action. From a judgment so holding plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.

The appeal is taken on the judgment roll. It appears…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ravenswood Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Chattanooga Dayton Bus Line v. BurneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Antichi v. New York Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Wilson v. Capital Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Abellon v. Hartford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. United States v. StreidelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. United Services Automobile Assn. v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API