Legal Opinion
Mondelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 7, 1986PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, Robert L. Mondelli, sustained personal injuries when struck by a hit-and-run vehicle while he was leaning against his girlfriend’s car. He seeks recovery under the uninsured-motorist (UM) provisions of two policies, each furnishing UM coverage in the amount of $15,000. One policy was issued to plaintiff’s father by defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), and the other, issued by defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), covered an automobile owned by Jay M. Chandler, father of Mondelli’s girlfriend.
As called for by the provisions of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Ciecka v. Transamerica Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Mondelli v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Mondelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
3Cited by29 opinions
- Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Magnifico v. Rutgers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Burns v. Market Transition Fac.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookinhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.